For those who aren’t familiar with ABC’s show Modern Family,
the show focuses around the
families of the grandfather, Jay Pritchett, and his two adult children, Claire
and Mitchel. The show has been called progressive because it the diversity in
the families depicted. There’s Claire Dumphy’s nuclear family (heterosexual
marriage with her white husband Phil and their kids, Haley, Alex and Luke), and
Jay’s multiethnic family from a second marriage (to a younger, Columbian wife
Gloria, and her son Manny, from her first marriage) and finally Mitchel (and
his partner Cameron, another white upper middle class gay man, and their
adopted Asian daughter, Lily).
However, a
little closer look into the show can reveal a prevalent gendered undertone. In
one particular episode, titled “Claire, Haley and Alex’s Emotions!” the main
storyline revolves around the fact that all three of the Dumphy women are on
their periods at the same time, and essentially to the Dumphy men (Phil &
Luke) this is a poorly timed event that is worse than Armageddon! While the two
goofy guys go to hilarious lengths to tiptoe around their “Monstrating” loved
ones, the three girls are behaving in exaggeratedly dramatic fashions (i.e.
emotional roller coaster times three).
This ties in to
what we’ve been discussing in class about gender stereotypes as both latent and
manifest content in the media. More specifically, Claire Dumphy is a
stereotypical loving wife/mother (i.e. attractive, homemaker, primarily poised
in the domestic labor sphere, and child caretaker). In this episode she and her
daughters are seen as overly emotional, crying or bitchy, which plays into the
typical gender stereotypes of women. While the producers try to use the fact
that they were all on their periods as an excuse for their extreme behavior and
the guys’ excessive precautionary lengths, by reinforcing traditional gender
stereotypes it actually works against the progressive attitude that the show is
typically known for.
By the time it
was all over I didn’t know who to feel more sorry for, the girls for the
ridiculous portrayal of them, or the guys for having to put up with it. This
show is typically hilarious. I love it but have to admit this episode was
disappointing in comparison to their standards for most other episodes. This
episode alone definitely won’t discourage me from watching, but if you’ve never
seen the show before I’d probably recommend you don’t watch this episode first
(good thing it wasn’t in the first season!).
For this analysis I was referencing the Holz and Ivory (2009) article "Gendered Relationships on Television: Portrayals of Same-Sex and Heterosexual Couples" regarding the submissive codes which we generally all reiterated to be stereotypically female roles/attitudes.
ReplyDelete