Thursday, August 2, 2012

Olympic-Sized Orgy

In anticipation of today's discussion about sports/gender/sexuality, my roommates and I were recently talking about how hot the Olympians were--I mean, say what you want about how tall the US Men's Gymnasts are but you could serve drinks off of those pectorals (and yeah, I know that's a pretty objectifying comment, but it's also true). Anyway, this prompted us to imagine how crazy things get in the Olympic Village; we wondered how many of those uber-sexy athletes were spending some of their training time under the sheets, if you know what I mean, and one of my roommates said she had seen some crazy statistics somewhere so I did a little searching and found this article on ESPN.com found here. It is 100% worth a read, even if you're just curious about what really goes on after NBC's cameras are shut off, and the numbers are pretty staggering. I'll make a list of the more shocking points:

1. The organizers of the Olympic Games ordered 100,000 condoms especially for the use of the Olympians staying in the Olympic Village.

2. By one Olympian's estimate, 70-75% of the athletes are hooking up with each other.

3. Some athletes, such as the infamous Ryan Lochte and US Sprinter LeShawn Merritt, have essentially said they can't wait to get it on--Merritt: "When I'm done leaving my legacy on the track, I'll make sure London remembers me." Hide yo kids, hide yo wife, London, Merritt is trying to get it in.

4. Once their events are over, athletes will constantly go to clubs and drink in the Olympic Village, which, as we saw in the Sex, Lies, & Alcohol video, can and does lead to giant amounts of sexy time.

5. Many of the athletes interviewed in the article mention the fact that the Village is a breeding ground for this sort of excessive sexual behavior because everyone is so fit and beautiful; as American javelin thrower Breaux Greer puts it, "Even if their face is a 7, their body is a 20."

6. "It's like Vegas. You learn not to ask lots of questions."

7. Another reason that attempts to explain the enormous amount of hooking up is that training takes up an athlete's entire day and subsequently, life. A common feeling is that they have little time to meet anyone, and once they get into the Olympic Village, they are surrounded by people who understand what it's like to be an Olympian and having that connection acts as a catalyst for sexual activity.

I'll let you guys read the article, but I've gathered a few interesting conclusions from this subject. First, most of the athletes seem to be following Ward's definition of recreational sex (1995) since the article mentions a constant flow of different sexual partners in and out of athletes' rooms, as well as mentioning the fact that many of the athletes have excess energy from their highly intensive training, and sex is one way for them to simply blow off steam. However, my last point (#7) suggests a deeper level of feeling to the sex, perhaps falling under Ward's relational sex category (1995) because the connection between athletes is something more than surface-level attraction; it is a way to relate to one other, or rather because they can relate to each other they are more likely to crave sex. Another interesting thing to consider is the seemingly central role that alcohol plays in the Olympic Village. High alcohol consumption is rampant and this will lead to more sexual activity, as alcohol always seems to do; the partying, "let loose" sort of lifestyle in the Olympic Village is compared to a college campus and the first year of college--a place where partying can lead to sexual activity but sometimes with negative consequences. It makes me wonder--if the Olympic Village is like a college campus with excess partying, do negative things that occur at college parties occur in the Village as well? Sexual assault, attempted rape, alcohol poisoning, date rape drugs? Would I be surprised if they did happen and were completely covered up? These are representatives of our countries, after all; if Ryan Lochte, for instance, tried to rape a gymnast from Austria or something I can't imagine that we would hear about it for the sake of our patriotic pride. The athletes talk about how they can do whatever they want inside the Village and outside just by flashing their medals; how many other things can they get away with due to their celebrity status?

Finally, I find it extremely interesting that the Olympians value each other for their 0% body-fat bodies. This is almost taking objectification to the extreme, but everyone does it to each other so what's the harm? Well, in the case of the Olympians, perhaps the constant surroundings of perfect bodies gives them a skewed sense of what constitutes a normal human physique. And, as an application of these perceptions much like the application of the promiscuous female stereotype in Ferguson et al, objectifying one other as much as the Olympians seem to do could lead all of them (which is about 10,000 people) to turn those attitudes to the outside world and view everyone they encounter with a highly unrealistic expectation as to what they will look like and an assumption that it's okay to treat men and women as objects.

On a sidenote, the Olympians are pretty scrumptious and the comments on their bodies/faces by many viewers of the Olympics could act as priming, again like in the Ferguson et al study; if a guy spends hours watching female gymnastics and talking about how hot all of the girls are and what great bodies they have--basically, objectifying the girls--what's to stop him from carrying this critical eye into the rest of his day and applying it to every woman he sees? Just something to think about.

Read the article. It's shockingly interesting.




2 comments:

  1. Thanks for the blog post, Mary. I hadn't read/heard of this ESPN article before, but I had read another about US Olympic Women's Soccer Goalkeeper Hope Solo's description of what really goes down in Olympic Village. Here is that article:
    http://jezebel.com/5925674/hope-solo-says-that-the-olympic-village-is-just-a-giant-booze+fueled-orgy-for-super-fit-people

    This blog is about her interview in ESPN Magazine's "Body Issue" where she cheekily discusses her experience in Olympic Village, or what's also referred to by another athlete as a "frat party with a really nice gene pool". Here is that article:
    http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/olympics-2012/hope-solo-olympians-train-hard-party-harder-article-1.1113139#ixzz20Re3f5Tq

    The article also features a quote from another female Olympian and gold medalist, swimmer Summer Sanders, saying "What happens in the village stays in the village." The title of the article, "Hope Solo: Olympians train hard but party harder (Olympic soccer star discusses the Summer Games' dirtiest secrets, from binge drinking to public sex" says a lot on it's own. All this implicitly described recreational sex among the olympians reminded me of the Markle article we read, "Can Women Have Sex Like a Man?", discussing the series as reflecting "the brave new world of sexual equality and assertiveness." (Markle, 2008). It also explained how women's sexuality was presented "as part of a consumer lifestyle in which women's sexual power and pleasure are encouraged. Sexual relationships are the consumption of fashion and entertainment are front and center." (Markle, 2008).

    It also called to mind Kim et al.'s discussion of feminine courtship strategies, "Women can/do/should objectify themselves, and Women are valued primarily for their physical appearance" (Kim et al., 2007), especially having the magazine cover featuring a nude Hope Solo. These articles also challenged the "Sex as Masculinity" script in which men are the ones who are "consumed by sexual thoughts, fantasies, and urges." and also the ones who "talk openly about their sexual desires and experiences" (Kim et al., 2007).

    Solo talks openly about how "Athletes are extremists. When they're training, it's laser focus. When they go out for a drink it's 20 drinks. With a once-in-a-ilfetime experience, you want to build memories, whether it's sexual, partying or on the field." While Hope's interview wasn't completely riddled with explicit descriptions of olympian sexual escapades (other than casually mentioning she's seen sex "on the grass, between buildings, people getting down and dirty"), she very strongly implicitly discussed her experiences in the sexually liberated environment know as Olympic Village, referring to her personal rendez-vous as her "Olympic Secret". For a woman this is still a pretty bold conversation to have, let alone publicly via multiple media outlets. Thanks again for the Olympic blog post!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mary I think this is an extremely enlightening and interesting post. Firstly, I had no idea any of this was going on in the Olympic village, to be honest I just found out such a place existed two days ago. After our class discussion I feel as though this post brings up some thoughtful questions. We discussed the issue surrounding the Olympics and criticism involving athletes being judged for their appearances and whether or not it is warranted or acceptable since they are technically there to compete. While the politically correct answer would be no, that judging or commenting on athletes appearances is unacceptable and inappropriate this article brought forth many comments that Olympic athletes made regarding their competitors appearances. For instance, Julie Foudy a past soccer player compared the cafeteria in the village similar to one in high school "except everyone's beautiful.” American javelin thrower, Breaux Greer was quoted saying, "Even if their face is a 7, their body is a 20.” Similar comments from other athletes are mentioned throughout the entire article. Clearly these athletes seem to be judging, commenting, or appreciating their fellow competitors physical appearances and capitalizing on them. If the athletes themselves are doing it does that make it more ok? Kim (2007) even identified showing off physical strength as an essential aspect of the masculine courting strategy. If that is the case, are the male athletes who walk around wearing revealing outfits that emphasize their bodies simply abiding and reinforcing important courting skills in our society and the media? I think that in a society where appearances matter especially in the Olympics when the athletes rarely are broadcast even speaking it becomes second nature to comment on their appearances. In I wonder however, if this is only socially acceptable when they are making complimentary comments. For instance the negative comments regarding Gabby’s hair received serious backlash and criticism. Even the response from the woman athlete that Julia read today mentioned it being acceptable if the man had said he found her attractive and but since he does not then he should not voice his “close minded” opinion. Perhaps there is a double standard and it is acceptable to make comments that are positive and boost the athletes self esteem but not ok if they are negative on the basis that looks don’t matter performance does as an athlete. I’m still trying to mull through where I stand on these questions myself but overall awesome article, I diffidently had no idea this was happening!

    ReplyDelete